AI-written summary of reporting by Vox. No human editor reviewed this. AI can misread or omit facts — read the original, linked below.
ABSTRACT

Psychologists and neuroscience researchers say the human brain's capacity to focus has not been permanently damaged by smartphone and social media use, but recovering it requires deliberate effort — specifically, allowing the brain to rest and being intentional about how attention is directed, according to several attention researchers interviewed for this report.

Attention researchers offer strategies for rebuilding focus in the age of smartphones

Attention researchers offer strategies for rebuilding focus in the age of smartphones

Psychologists and neuroscience researchers say the human brain's capacity to focus has not been permanently damaged by smartphone and social media use, but recovering it requires deliberate effort — specifically, allowing the brain to rest and being intentional about how attention is directed, according to several attention researchers interviewed for this report.

Context

The human brain processes one thing at a time, according to the article, and switching between tasks — what is commonly called multitasking — drains cognitive resources and makes it harder to pay attention in the future. When the brain's prefrontal cortex, which handles executive function, is fatigued, blood flow to that region decreases.

Attention restoration theory (ART), first developed in the 1980s by University of Michigan psychology professors Stephen and Rachel Kaplan, holds that time spent in nature restores directed attention by engaging involuntary attention and allowing cognitive resources to recover. Marc Berman, a former student of Stephen Kaplan and now a professor at the University of Chicago, distinguishes between 'soft fascinations' — natural stimuli such as waterfalls or swaying tree branches that hold attention without consuming it — and 'hard fascinations' such as Times Square or social media feeds, which capture attention so fully that recovery is slow.

In one study Berman conducted with his team, including Kaplan, research subjects were given difficult attention and memory tasks, sent on a walk in either a nature setting or an urban environment, and then retested. Participants who walked in nature improved their performance by about 20 percent, Berman said, and the improvement held regardless of whether participants reported enjoying the walk.

A study published in 2017 found that even having a phone within sight can reduce cognitive capacity and affect the ability to concentrate, according to the article.

All Perspectives
Gloria Mark, author of Attention Span: Mark said: 'It's a myth to think that we should push ourselves to focus as long as possible and we'll be more productive.'
Amishi Jha, University of Miami neuroscience professor: Jha said: 'What we need most is the capacity to know where attention is, moment by moment, and greater agency over our attention so we can direct it intentionally. We need to stop trying to recover from cognitive fatigue and overload by consuming more information.'
Marc Berman, University of Chicago professor: Berman said of doomscrolling and streaming: 'They're activities that maybe seem restful, but we actually think that they're fatiguing and depleting.' On why nature may help, he said: 'It's easy to get the gist and you don't need to encode all the details. Whereas in the built environment, it's not very fractal and you might have to encode everything, which might be more taxing.'
Nilli Lavie, University College London psychology professor: Lavie said: 'One of the great misconceptions about attention is that it's simply a matter of us paying attention. It's not enough to just want to pay attention.'
Gaps & Unknowns
  • The source does not state the sample size or full methodology of the Berman nature-walk study.
  • The source does not identify the journal or authors of the 2017 study on phone proximity and cognitive capacity beyond a link reference.
  • The source does not state whether the attention restoration theory has been replicated across diverse populations or settings beyond the studies cited.
  • The source does not state Berman's specific fractal theory has been peer-reviewed or experimentally confirmed as the mechanism for nature's restorative effect.
  • The source text supplied appears truncated; some material may be missing.
Sources & Further Reading
  1. Vox — original

Read the original at Vox

Related Coverage