The European Broadcasting Union, which organises the Eurovision Song Contest, announced on 12 August that winning broadcasters will be automatically ineligible to host the competition if their country is involved in an armed conflict, a sensitive geopolitical situation, or any other situation materially affecting the security, safety or stability of their state or immediate region. The organisers also raised the minimum age for competitors from 16 to 18.
Eurovision bars conflict-affected countries from hosting and raises minimum competitor age to 18

The European Broadcasting Union, which organises the Eurovision Song Contest, announced on 12 August that winning broadcasters will be automatically ineligible to host the competition if their country is involved in an armed conflict, a sensitive geopolitical situation, or any other situation materially affecting the security, safety or stability of their state or immediate region. The organisers also raised the minimum age for competitors from 16 to 18.
Under Eurovision's traditional format, the previous year's winning country hosts the following edition. The next contest is due to take place in Bulgaria in 2027 following singer Dara's victory for that country in May, according to The Guardian.
The EBU said the rule changes were guided by feedback from member broadcasters and are intended to provide greater clarity for artists and production staff while ensuring a safe and welcoming environment, according to statements from both sources.
Although no country was mentioned by name in the announcement, Israel has been at war in Gaza since Hamas's attack on 7 October 2023. Israel finished second in both the 2025 and 2026 competitions, according to both sources.
Five countries — Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland, Iceland and Slovenia — boycotted the 2026 edition held in Vienna, citing Israel's participation and its conduct in the war in Gaza. It is unclear, according to The Guardian, if or when any of the boycotting countries will rejoin the contest.
Under the new rules, if a winning broadcaster is found ineligible to host, the EBU will appoint an alternative host broadcaster that will organise the contest in its own right and will not be required to stage the event on behalf of another member. In cases falling outside outright armed conflict, the EBU said it could commission an independent security assessment to determine whether a country can safely host.
The 2023 contest was held in Liverpool after Ukraine won in 2022 but was unable to host due to Russia's full-scale invasion. Ukraine had previously hosted in 2017, at a time when conflict existed in the country's east between Ukrainian forces and Moscow-backed separatists, according to The Straits Times.
Regarding the age change, the organisers stated the move was intended to strengthen safeguarding and protect younger artists from the pressures of competing. The youngest person to win the contest was Sandra Kim of Belgium, who was 13 years old when she won in 1986, according to The Straits Times.
According to The Guardian, the 2026 Eurovision final was watched by 130 million viewers globally, down from 160 million in 2025. Despite the financial and viewership impact of the boycott, The Guardian reports that a spin-off contest, Eurovision Song Contest Asia, is set to take place in Bangkok in November, and that Canada will join the contest as the first new participant since Australia in 2015.
- No response or comment from Israel or its participating broadcaster appears in any of the sources.
- The sources do not establish whether the new hosting rules would have applied to Israel had it won either the 2025 or 2026 contest, or how the EBU would have ruled in such a scenario.
- The sources do not detail what specific feedback from member broadcasters drove the rule changes, beyond a general reference to annual review processes.
- It is not established whether any of the five boycotting countries have indicated they will return to the contest under the new rules.
- The sources do not specify how the independent security assessment process will work in practice or which body would conduct it.
- The Straits Times — original — by The Straits Times
- The Guardian — by Nadia Khomami
Read the original at The Straits Times