AI-written summary of reporting by The Guardian US. No human editor reviewed this. AI can misread or omit facts — read the original, linked below.
ABSTRACT

California's Department of Pesticide Regulation announced on Tuesday that it had canceled the state's last remaining paraquat pesticide registration, effectively banning the herbicide over concerns about its links to Parkinson's disease, cancer, and other health harms. The substance will be phased out over two years.

California cancels last paraquat registrations, banning herbicide over Parkinson's disease links

California cancels last paraquat registrations, banning herbicide over Parkinson's disease links

California's Department of Pesticide Regulation announced on Tuesday that it had canceled the state's last remaining paraquat pesticide registration, effectively banning the herbicide over concerns about its links to Parkinson's disease, cancer, and other health harms. The substance will be phased out over two years.

Context

Paraquat is sprayed on approximately 14 million pounds of US cropland annually, applied to wine grapes, pistachios, almonds, walnuts, pears, citrus, soybeans, cotton, and other crops, most commonly in California's Central Valley and the Mississippi River valley. Its use in the US tripled between 2008 and 2018 and has continued to increase since.

California is the largest US user of paraquat and the country's largest agricultural producer. It is the second US state to prohibit paraquat, following Vermont. The ban follows a 2024 state law requiring the pesticide division to re-evaluate the substance's health risks.

A preliminary review by the DPR confirmed human health concerns, including associations between paraquat exposure and thyroid disease, reproductive harms, and birth defects. The department also found potential risks to birds and mammals, and noted that restrictions intended to reduce environmental exposure might not be effective because paraquat can remain in soil for potentially decades.

The DPR began requesting updated health and environmental data from pesticide makers. Rather than provide that information, manufacturers withdrew their use permits. Syngenta, the Chinese-owned firm that produced the largest volume of the pesticide, withdrew its permit in April and announced it would stop producing paraquat altogether.

More than 70 countries, including China, the United Kingdom, and EU member states, have already banned paraquat. The US Environmental Protection Agency reapproved it in 2021 and 2024. Public health groups led by the Earthjustice nonprofit have filed a federal lawsuit alleging the EPA has ignored broad scientific consensus linking paraquat to Parkinson's disease; that legal challenge remains ongoing.

All Perspectives
Center for Biological Diversity (Nathan Donley): Nathan Donley, environmental health science director with the Center for Biological Diversity, called paraquat "the most acutely lethal pesticide ever made" and said: "I don't think anyone thought this was going to happen this quickly, but it's very welcome news." He also said: "We're really the last major agricultural power that still uses paraquat, and we use a ton of it." On the federal level, Donley said there is "a regulatory capture there that is entrenched in the culture at the EPA, and has been for decades, and there is no desire within the agency to go against what industry wants," adding that even if the EPA wished to act, "it's very hard for them to do that because of the weak laws. They have to jump over a million hoops."
California Department of Pesticide Regulation (Karen Morrison): The DPR described the cancellation as a "voluntary" industry decision that came after the 2024 law required regulators to begin re-reviewing paraquat's risks. DPR Director Karen Morrison said: "We need the right data to identify where there are risks to people and the environment."
California Farm Bureau: The California Farm Bureau opposed the 2024 state law, claiming it "bypasses the scientific review process" and would lead to a ban of paraquat. The bureau suggested at the time that it would sue over the legislation, though no legal case has been filed.
Public health and farmworker advocates: Advocates said industry almost certainly chose to withdraw use permits rather than share health data because "the data is so alarming," and characterized the California decision as a major public health win.
Position not represented in the source reporting: EPA; Syngenta.
Gaps & Unknowns
  • The source does not state the specific terms or timeline under which Syngenta and other pesticide makers withdrew their California permits.
  • The source does not identify which other pesticide makers, beyond Syngenta, withdrew permits or held registrations at the time of cancellation.
  • The source does not state the current status of the Earthjustice federal lawsuit against the EPA or the court in which it was filed.
  • The source does not include a response from the EPA to the California ban or to the ongoing federal legal challenge.
  • The source does not include a response from Syngenta to the California ban announcement or to characterizations of its conduct regarding health data.
  • The source does not state what specific data the DPR requested from pesticide makers or what timeline was given for its submission.
Sources & Further Reading
  1. The Guardian US — original

Read the original at The Guardian US

Related Coverage